|
Shakespeare
Will Burn, Regardless: Bullets Over Broadway and The
Real Problem with VCR Remotes
by
Douglas Curran
|
Today
I rented and watched Woody Allen's Bullets Over Broadway.
I'd already seen it at least three times before, but who can account
for taste or moods? The movie's one of my favorites, and I felt
like seeing it again. In fact, I have my own copy, but as a result
of botched VCR programming the last three minutes are missing. I
have only myself to blame for the poor copy job. Nevertheless, who
would expect me to watch a movie whose last three minutes were missing?
I tried that once -- before having learned of the copying blunder.
I watched my tape to the very last scene: David Shayne (John Cusack)
stands below Shelden Flender's (Rob Reiner) Greenwich Village apartment
window, on the other side of which Flender sleeps with Shayne's
neglected girlfriend, Ellen (Mary-Louise Parker). It is late. Shayne's
play has opened that night in New York to great applause, but the
work was not his, the success not his. Shayne arrives beneath the
dark window certain of two things. He is not an artist, and he loves
Ellen. He calls to Flender, to Ellen. Ellen comes down. She tells
us and Flender she'll always love Shayne. She stands before him
and he speaks. He has given up his pretension to the role of artist,
recognizing the futility of this pursuit. He has already wasted
too much time. Shayne asks her to return with him to Pittsburgh,
to marry him. But before I get to hear Ellen's final words, the
last words of the movie, my TV screen goes blue with white letters
proclaiming "no signal." That's the end of my recording.
I know how the movie ends. I shouldn't need the last words, but
I do. That day I turned off the TV and VCR with a vague feeling
of unease, a sense that one little piece was missing, that my emotional
investment in Bullets Over Broadway had been misplaced, defrauded.
And so today, when the mood and inclination to watch the movie came
upon me, I had no choice but to go out and rent it. And I did. Gladly.
Sure enough,it didn't go perfectly. About half-way through, the
top 2 1\2 inches of the picture conspired against the lower 12 1\2,
mangling and bending the top portion of the image till it was at
right angles with the lower. I have no means of adjusting tracking.
The distortion didn't bother me that much, though, and the tape
made it all the way through. I was able to watch until the credits
finished rolling and the music stopped, and I was happy.
My
trouble with the VCR remote came later. Mine was not the commonly
noted problem of a lost and hard to find remote, but a difficulty
far more insidious in nature. I am certain that I'm not alone here.
Perhaps difficulty is not the right word. My remote wasn't lost.
I had it in my hand, and it worked. On tapes in the VCR, it functioned
as it should. But I wanted it to work during situations in which
I clearly had no right or reason to expect it to. Watching David
Letterman after the movie, I missed a joke or a reference made by
a guest (a British actress, whose name I missed, who played the
role of a publishing house editor in Reality Bites who asks
Winona Ryder for the definition of irony). I reached for the remote,
intent on rewinding. Then caught myself. This occurred twice more
before I stopped to think about what I was doing. During Bullets
Over Broadway I had stopped the movie several times, rewound
and paused, to catch things I missed when my attention wandered
or to look at things more closely or to hear a line or scene I relished
particularly or considered crucial. Several times I listened to
David Shayne scream out his window "I'm a whore!" feeling
his work compromised. Twice (for I had been distracted the first
time by the booming base of the stereo from a car which idled outside
my window, waiting for the light to turn, on the street below) I
watched the scene with Helen Sinclair imploring David --"Don't
speak! Don't speak!" -- while she put her hands to his mouth
to prevent his professing love. At the end on hearing one of Ellen's
final lines that I consider extremely important, I listened and
then played it again just to be sure I heard it right: "I could
love a man if he's not a real artist. But I couldn't love an artist
if he's not a real man." This was complete control (minus tracking
difficulties). In renting the video, I was sure that I wouldn't
miss a thing. I was certain to get all that I wanted from the rented
video. Fast-forward, rewind, pause. All with a button from the VCR
remote. Later, I felt genuine if faint disappointment each time
I reached for the remote with the intention of fast-forwarding commercials
or rewinding Dave or pausing to wait out the car stereo which shook
my windows.
***
In
Woody Allen's Bullets Over Broadway, life and art are in
conflict. Early on, Flender presents to his cafe sidewalk entourage
an essential question: Given a burning building and the opportunity
to run into it and save only one of two things -- either the last
known copy of Shakespeare's works or an anonymous human being, what
do you save? There is no question, Flender asserts. Save Shakespeare!
The greatest artist portrayed in the movie, the mobster Cheech (Chazz
Palminteri), is this assertion's embodiment. Being in effect the
true genius behind the play around which the movie circles, he will
have no one sully and diminish the work. Cheech kills Olive (Jennifer
Tilly), one of the play's actresses, who could be removed in no
other way, rather than have his words, his play ruined. The price
he pays for this, his art, is life. Olive was there by intractable
arrangement, by decree of the show's producer, Cheech's boss, Olive's
boyfriend, gangster Nick Valenti (Joe Viterelli). Cheech knew the
risk involved in offing Olive, but accepted it; the true artist,
or at least the great artist, Allen tells us, has no choice. For
Cheech, art comes first. Dying by gunshot, blood flowing, he speaks
his last words to David Shayne. They are not words of regret but
instructions on how to end the play. His last thought is not for
himself, but for his art -- which for Cheech is clearly more important
than his life, than any life.
Inspiring
Flender's words and Cheech's actions is the desire to make in and
of art something greater than life in all its vicissitude and uncertainty,
a will to transcend the significance of life and death. In art the
Chimera of the Eternal glitters, the image of Immortality dances,
and a facade of omnipotence is erected on the stage. Art offers
the quixotic promise of control. Art is quixotic in its suggestion
and offering for the very reason that it exists in the midst of
life. Only by means of life does art exist at all, and life is epitomized
ultimately by its powerlessness and lack of control. We walk a fraying
line across the rift. We cannot preserve ourselves much less our
creations. Light and air alone will claim every piece of paper,
every canvas on which Leonardo set his hand. To save the last copy
of the Works of Shakespeare from fire at the cost of life is to
exercise a desperate futility that nullifies life. Shakespeare will
burn, regardless. We are not gods. Copies will be blurred, VCR tapes
shortened and distorted. We cannot forestall that which will occur,
we cannot forestall the accidental, we cannot forestall the passage
of time.
Thankfully,
Allen offers a larger view of art. Particularly relevant are Ellen's
words, already cited above. I will rewind, and repeat them. To David,
she says: "I could love a man if he's not a real artist. But
I couldn't love an artist if he's not a real man." The real
man puts life before art, does not futilely deny life for the sake
of art. But this is not a denial of art's significance. Ellen's
statement allows for an art that affirms life, and in so affirming
accepts its own mortality, its participation in life. She returns
to David when he returns to her, when he respects life and offers
his commitment in the form of a proposal. Her Joycean yes
which ends the movie is a yes that recognizes infidelity, sin, inconstancy,and
mutability; it is a yes that recognizes death; and it is a yes which
embraces life, and affirms the simple virtue of living. Her yes
recognizes the infirmity of life and art, but still she stands hopeful,
above all nourishing a desire to live.
***
I
recognize, the further one moves from art, the less control one
can pretend to until existence is revealed as precarious indeed.
Nevertheless, I naturally remain, irrationally, partially, quixotic
to the end. My habitual use (or misuse) of the VCR remote control
betrays the state my desire. If only I could bring that remote with
me, out and onto the street where I can rewind, fast-forward and
pause all that I see around me. No longer would I wait interminably
in traffic snarls; no longer would I stumble in my speech at least
as far as others saw -- I could go back and try again, and again;
no longer would I suffer drawn out pain; no longer would a moment
of pleasure last a mere moment, but indefinitely, at my command;
no longer would an end in certain death confine me, I could go back
and back forever.
Today
I rented and watched Woody Allen's Bullets Over Broadway...
Douglas.S.Curran.27@nd.edu
|